As far as the pink elephant goes, you've just changed it to be an animal that resembles an elephant as we know it. I'm literally talking about a flying pink elephant. Not an animal that resembles an elephant, but an actual elephant as we know it. So yes, I'm absolutely correct in what I said and you are wrong. Btw, I never claimed to have a PhD and I'm sure that you don't either, so I have no idea why you even mentioned it. However, the flying pink elephant was specifically discussed in my theoretical physics course which is how I know that I'm correct. See, I actually talk about things that I know for sure before spewing out nonsense on Reddit like you apparently do. Also, where and how did I gloss over the possibility of a multiverse. You mentioned both that and the infinite universe, and I told you how you were wrong about the infinite universe part. There was no glossing over anything.
I don't need a pat on the back; I just figured that since you were being a dick about how I couldn't back up what I said and you saw it coming and then I did back it up, it deserved mentioning.
Maybe I have a different definition than you for the word "attack", but I'm sure that telling a complete stranger that they have poor reading comprehension is considered an attack on someone by most people. You were attacking my intelligence simply because I disagreed with something you said. Clearly the lack of reading comprehension from me is imaginary on your part as you haven't yet showed any evidence of such a thing. You also glossed over the fact that I'm in the 99th percentile in reading comprehension according to the tests I took at a state university. You either ignored it, or you're choosing not to believe it which is fine because I know that it's 100% true which is why I find your constant mention of reading comprehension to be laughable.
As for the ad hominem, you did use it to discredit my point. There was no other reason to falsely throw that into your argument other than using it as an attempt to make me seem unintelligent which would serve to discredit me. You don't have to specifically state that you were refuting my point by saying it for it to be an ad hominem. Maybe you should google it again.
You called me out on something that wasn't true. I do take that as an insult. It wasn't a reasonable explanation because as I already stated, you did not make that point in the comment that I was replying to. You may have in a different comment, but not the one that I was replying to. So you tried to call me out on something but failed. Nice job. Are we done yet?