Wow, how long did that take to write?

"Do you have an example of a black man killing a teenager of a different race with no witnesses, and then just telling his side of the story and being sent home?"

*The answer to my original question is NO then?

There were witnesses.

You don't even know the basic facts of the case you're trying to argue.

*Oh, is that why they had to play those cries for help on the news both Zim's brother and Trayvon's mom claimed the screams were coming from their relative? Those kinds of witnesses? lol

It's hilarious you people have to cling to him being a teenager

*If you want to change the laws about age, that's fine, but until you do you just need to ACCEPT that he was a teenager. No big deal.

The OP comment we strayed so far from. "It's the hypocrisy of rioting about black teenagers being killed by white people" By Police. Not "white people", and if you see that in an article, take it up to the media you're reading."

Your original condition was that Blacks only riot over police killing black men. Then I disproved that by giving you an example of a person who was not a cop who killed a black man.

You see, someone goes "blacks only riot when a white person kills a black person". I say "that's not true, it's by Police, not just any old white person, because that's just a crime. Then you enter with your GZ example, but wait GZ isn't white? So what are you talking about?

This part hasn't happened yet

So then you'll reply "They were calling him white Hispanic, white this, yada, yada, yada. Then I'll refer you back to my original comment..."By Police. Not "white people", and if you see that in an article, take it up to the media you're reading."