If you'd like to talk about the equations/theory I'd love to.
Well, managed to find some time to go through some of the videos over the past day and I guess I do have a few questions:
1) Nassim seems to claim that certain geographic landmarks constitute some kind of "proof" of his toroidal theory, yet he continues to use incorrect values for many of these formations. Why does he feel the need to lie about the longitude/latitude of natural formations in order to further his theory?
2) Why does his resolution of quantum theory and the standard model require something that has never been observed and we know is impossible through observation and experimentation (the Schwartzchild proton)? How does he reconcile the fact that it is something we know doesn't exist?
3) As stated by the reviewer above, Nassim makes basic errors in his definitions while also not explaining others. Why should we trust somebody who is incapable of communicating their point properly?
4) There are numerous, rudimentary (grade school level) scientific errors in nearly all of his presentations. These errors are then repeated (much like his incorrect analysis of the location of geographic landmarks) as if they are fact. Why should we listen to somebody who is clearly outright lying about certain scientific facts?
On to more practical questions:
5) How is it possible that Nassim is able to afford a monstrous venue on the Hawaiian islands to promote his Resonance Project, yet is unable to conduct a single peer-reviewed experiment or publish a single peer-reviewed paper? Where is the money going?
6) Why is it that every time the topic is discussed with actual physicists, it is widely dismissed, in contrast to the ideas posted in the OP? Do you believe that this is based purely on philosophical grounds, or is it possible that his inability to recite basic scientific facts properly has led him to be "shunned" in the scientific community?
7) May of the times that his physics were shown to be incorrect by people more knowledgeable than myself you abandoned ship. Have you contacted the Resonance Academy about these discrepancies? What did they say? Why haven't you addressed these issues?
https://np.reddit.com/r/Physics/comments/2cqjhm/discussion_considering_the_proton_as_a_black_hole/
The list of bad physics with this guy really does seem to be endless, but I'm certain at this point your mind is set regardless of the overwhelming scientific evidence to the contrary.