I know Tulsi means well, but the trickery of the elite takes a lot of cunning to unravel. To summarize Tulsi's personality, she is a military person first and foremost. She dislikes our foreign wars, but supports American government, however that can be interpreted. She is also more active, and less bookish, than say Hillary.
The reason I like Trump is that he dislikes this government - in all forms; he WILL shut it down. Trump is also bookish, cunning, and better understands evil than the average; Trump sees himself as a leader, not a delegate. He does what he sees as best, regardless of agreement or common understanding.
Tulsi worked with the Bernie campaign, along with Nina Turner. Nina Turner is much more of the revolutionary, and the Dems wouldn't allow her onto the stage. Tulsi was the one to introduce Bernie, and she did so proudly - whereas I'd suspect Trump would have walked out, considering the theft of the election.
Jill Stein and Ajamu Baraka are generically more politically intelligent that either, in one sense. Their ideas are closer to the optimal than say Bernie's. However, Trump understands the here-to-there approach. Where Jill says kill the military, Trump says withdraw and disengage. Where Ajamu might say end the quota system, Trump says 'learn to fend for yourself'. Where J & A run third party, Trump runs Republican.
Jill is a scientist and understands the technological power. Ajamu is a bottom-up revolutionary and understands the terror of government. Trump is a businessman and understand politics.
Tulsi is a military commander. She will make tough decisions, protect our people, and safeguard our troops. But there is a certain amount of low cunning required to sift through the maze these days, and from my experience military people are hesitant to see the fullness of the evil; they like to think of the system as fixable, correctable, if one applied the right moral aptitude, but the reality is it broke - any attempt at repair is time lost. Forget it, it's dead.