Why 21% is actually only 4.68%

I'm stunned at the audacity and blatant corruption on display here.

Why should any third party get a say, or profit from, the distribution to creditors?

I mean the following as an observation, and certainly not as an incitement, but if I was attempting to profit from the creditors in such a shady way I'd be worried for my own safety. Who knows how desperate a tiny minority of some creditors may become if they perceive that 'their' BTC is being 'stolen' from them again (by Coinbase or whoever). Would it really be worth it? I'd be a nervous wreck! It's the sort of thing movies are made of...

Again to clarify, you'd have to be an idiot to take the law into your own hands and threaten any sort of physical harm. I'm against that, and do not believe that anybody should do it, ever.

/r/mtgoxinsolvency Thread