22/M/Student

Ok, dummy. I'm turning my sights on you now because you're too easy a target with your horseshit logic. Now, close those futanari tabs you have open on the laptop you're using with the Justin Bieber stickers on the lid. I'm about to teach you some shit.

Dogs are statistically more likely to attack their owners, than say, a cat. Should we euthanize all of them?

You're stupid, so you don't understand that this comparison is illogical. The point is not that one demographic simply kills more, it's that 15-24 year old males commit a VASTLY disproportionate number of crimes. So we have people who are 15-25 years old, which is an extremely small percentage of the population, WAY smaller than 40%, yet they perpetrate violence at an kuch much higher rate than any other demographic.

I'm more likely to get killed in a car accident than if I were to take public transit every day. Should we ban cars?

Cars are necessary for society to exist in it's current state. Guns owned by civilians are not. But you can rest assured that in your lifetime you will live to see the day when almost all vehicles are operated by computers. And that will save a shitload of lives.

Your 40%, which is not even a majority, holds just as much weight as the above examples. You can't just make sweeping generalizations based upon a minority statistic.

It's not a minority statistic. They commit violence at a massively disproportionate rate to their numbers. Don't you understand, because I already explained this over and over, that this very small percentage of people are committing are proportionately huge amount of violence?

Now sit down, junior.

/r/EDC Thread Parent Link - imgur.com