3 "anonymous philosophers" throw temper tantrum about open letter defending GC philosophers' right to free speech

It’s just as wrong for a cis women to pressure someone into sex, as it is for a trans woman to pressure someone into sex.

And yet I cannot recall being pressured into sex by a cis woman. I do recall many articles (and videos and exchanges on social media and in person) denouncing people for their unwillingness to have sex with transsexuals. Why should a feminist be prevented from replying to those arguments? Why should we skirt around the fact that those arguments are advanced by transsexuals (and their supporters)? Okay, there is also another group of people that has a tendency to employ similar arguments. I'm sure that Stock could discuss males in general, but that also wouldn't be good enough of course. Either we pretend that transwomen and cis women are both pressuring everyone into sex with them, or we don't discuss this subject at all.

I do think that the general quality of GC writing could be improved though.

/r/GenderCritical Thread Link - dailynous.com