9/11 inside job “impossible to conceal,” says Vladimir Putin

I gave you the cupboard experiment. It is possible to break all the shelves in a cupboard. But then the frame remains standing. You have to devise a mechanism now to get rid of the frame also.

Imagine a freestanding 80 shelf cupboard where each shelf is a cement slab. Now drop a stack of 30 slabs on it from 12 feet in the air. I guarantee you the entire cupboard is a collapsed mess.

You keep pointing at the many, many, many "weak" connectors between the floor trusses and core and perimeter

Here, read this:

http://www.aws.org/wj/supplement/WJ_2007_09_s263.pdf

It's an actual study of the failure of the truss connectors in the towers, complete with pictures.

I don't want to be a spoiler, but I'll give away the ending. Over 90% of the truss connectors found below the crash sites of both towers were either bent downward or sheared completely off.

"This was probably related to the overloading of the floors below the impact region after collapse initiation."

"Failure in both cases was assumed to be a result of a shear mechanism as a result of overloading from floors above impacting those below."

In other words, the truss connections could not absorb the load and impact coming from above, and failed completely. Just like I said.

You claim that is because the towers were so big, but you can't cite a law that dictates that for structures > 400m, the laws of Newton apply no more.

Newtons laws apply, but not in the way that you claim they do.

To make your theory work, you pretend that each floor consisted of a 12 foot air gap. The whole structure consisted of 500.000 tons of steel hovering weightlessly between each of these 12 foot air gaps.

Nope. There was a core of columns, and perimeter columns, and no vertical bracing in between them.

Here is how each floor of the towers was assembled from overhead:

/r/conspiracy Thread Link - rt.com