For what it's worth, I recently found out I failed the PM-02 written assessment.

In one section they said I had failed to hit the majority of the points to consider. I can only say that I felt I had, so they must have wanted more detail on those points. Fair enough.

In another section I was presented with a scenario that I felt had no right answer, although clearly there must be a right answer. That is, I felt it was a dilemma and it was more important that I justify my actions rather than simply choose the "correct" response. Now I wonder if this was the case. They said I made conflicting conclusions, which

The biggest challenge I had was limiting all three of my responses to two typed pages. I understand the need to be succinct, but given that they wanted more detail, I would have liked a little more space. Still, everyone else wrote the test under the same rules, so I have to conclude that there was something else I could have done. Overall, I'll treat this as a learning opportunity.