So your position is that the father has no say, and no rights? Setting aside the false equivalencies of you argument, it’s simply not a morally defensible position. You don’t get it both ways. You don’t get to say the man has no say in whether or not a pregnancy goes forward and then stick him with the bill for 18 years. If a woman gets a choice, and I absolutely support that, then the man gets to make his own decision.

Now let’s talk about those false equivalencies. Every example you have is either something that solute applies equally to everyone, or it’s associated with a voluntary and ongoing activity. Neither of those conditions are true of this subject. Essentially what you’re advocating is forced servitude.