Jesus christ, the big brain on this one...
Everything I claim is irrelevant is irrelevant
Financial liability is irrelevant
because it was not mentioned anywhere in the original post.
The "but what if one doesn't agree to it" argument is not relevant
How often both parents agree to this is not relevant
Nowhere did I say those points wouldn't be relevant to the real world because I thought you could grasp the fact that we are talking about one specific case which doesn't have enough information to speculate about what would happen in the real world. And of course you couldn't concede that I was right so you had to try and take it off topic with your bullshit "how often," which, as I said earlier, is not relevant. To the conversation.