Well since I can only reply every ten minutes I may as well reply to both your comments here.

Hardly a gun free zone when there’s dozens of armed security around pushing people through metal detectors and pat downs.

So what you're saying is that only the government should have guns, and that would make us safer?

And

Okay. Good for her. I guess. What does that have to do with the NRA convention?

What does her having a security detail have to do with anything? My relevance to it was that this is an attempt to draw a false equivalency to the hypocrisy of the NRA allowing a gun free zone while advocating against gun free zones. Your relevance is that you somehow think that someone advocating for sensible gun control means they aren't allowed a security detail.