Amanda Todd’s accused cyberbully extradited to Canada to face charges

You're contriving a situation to suit your argument.

So an 18 year old with a picture of his 17 year old girlfriends pussy has child porn.

Yes, because that meets the criteria for:

(ii) the dominant characteristic of which is the depiction, for a sexual purpose, of a sexual organ or the anal region of a person under the age of eighteen years;

If an 18 year old has a full-frontal nude of a 17 year old, that wouldn't necessarily be CP because the "dominant characteristic" of the image has changed. Context matters, and it's a big reason around why people that get busted for having "terabytes" of CP usually only face a handful of actual CP charges.

/r/canada Thread Parent Link -