An editor of a scientific journal explains why he thinks the PCR paper by Prof Drosten was published under suspect and possibly fraudulent conditions.

The most pessimistic answer, if you want me to put on my "doomer" hat, is that we have been overcounting asymptomatic PCR positives* as cases (not least by setting Ct threshold high) and undercounting undetected symptomatic cases. If they roughly canceled each other out we would have a really high IFR (basically the current CFR) and are nowhere near herd immunity.

*This implies they don't develop a robust antibody response and are vulnerable to reinfection later, thus becoming a true case.

China did one thing right, and that's to not count asymptomatic carriers as cases. Makes things simple - and politically convenient too!

This is just a thought exercise. The discrepancy you point out bothers me too.

/r/LockdownCriticalLeft Thread Parent Link - threadreaderapp.com