Name a better combo than guys on reddit with weir d arguments and yelling "strawman" when it's treated as weird as it is. I compared their shooting because I think Ben Simmons is a better player than Tyrese Haliburton will likely become and I used a misleading piece of data at the end of a true statement. I thought that was incredibly obvious and you were asking a rhetorical question, sorry for assuming!

Funny how everyone is totally OK with ignoring every stat and advanced stat that Simmons is clearly better and was clearly better as a rookie too in favour of misleading and false claims like Haliburton being one of the best volume efficiency ratio rookies in recent NBA history. Misleading statements that compare only ts% and ignore everything else when it favours Haliburton = good, more context favouring Simmons and comparing same year ts% = fake and misleading. This circlejerk is getting insane, man.