I'm going to give everybody here an opportunity to dispel the neckbeard myth and seek answers for a genuine, if not controversial question. I would appreciate honest answers without knee-jerk downvotes. Again, I'm genuinely asking here, so let's have a conversation.

Two things for you to consider before you read my question. 1.) I am a Christian. 2.) I do not side with Anderson or his "brand."

That in mind...

I understand Anderson is very vocal. I understand he has expressed jubilation that Orlando shootings happened. Taking the emotion out of that and looking at it for what it is, however, that's not the same as actually encouraging his followers to act against homosexuals or calling for acts of violence. As far as I know, nobody has committed any violence as a result of sitting under Anderson's teachings.

On the other hand, there are many Muslim teachers that believe violence against infidels is justified - sometimes even required. Islam is undeniably against homosexuality, and there's no shortage of zealots worldwide who are ready to enforce that with violence.

My question is this: Why only Anderson? Apparently he's the first and only person to be targeted by this act since it's inception in 1999. There wasn't one Muslim who preached equal or more opposition, hate, and violence in the last 20 years?