If the stated dose is at least roughly correct, then why do you think his 200ug tabs have consistently tested as ~100ug, (+/-10ug) in like three different tests submitted by completely different people?
because if the BlueViking tabs are 100ug, then the tabs i've had in the past would be much closer to the threshold dose, which they haven't been.
for example: in college, i regularly got tabs that would barely cause breathing walls and some color enhancement, as well as some amount of mental change. i guess i'd have to admit that at that time i wasn't positive that that was LSD, but i've been consistently having the same feeling from LSD since then.
the tabs i've had from Alaska (advertised as 120ug) felt like much more than what i got in college, though it felt the same just more immersive. similarly, the tabs from BlueViking felt like "more" (as in, more immersive an experience) than those from Alaska did.
the reason that i trust the stated dose is that when i had those doses in college, my friends reported having more intense trips than i did, from the same batch. assuming then that those weren't just threshold doses (so maybe in the range of say 50-100ug) then it makes sense that the doses from Alaska (advertised as 120ug) felt more intense even at one tab. continuing that inference, the BlueViking tabs feel like they produce a more immersive experience than the tabs i've had in the past.
i absolutely will not deny that you could in fact be correct, and i could be way wrong. i've been wrong before, and i have no problem admitting that. the issue i have is that when i take 2 tabs from BlueViking, it feels like when i took 3-4 tabs from Alaska, and i was never able to achieve that level of "being out there" when i was in college, despite the fact that all the other effects seemed to be the same, just with varying levels of intensity.
i would love to have access to medically dosed liquid so i could really have something to compare to, and i would readily admit i was wrong if that were to be the case. when i say "roughly correct" i mean that maybe the tabs aren't 200ug, maybe 150-180ug. i don't want to accuse anyone of being wrong, and i could very well be myself. but i've enjoyed the tabs i've had from BlueViking, and i like the price/service/shipping so unless i receive more definitive info (the post questioning BlueViking's dose claims was itself called into question by the poster who originally posted the lab results) i will continue to be comfortable with the tabs i have purchased.
If the stated dose is at least roughly correct, then why do you think his 200ug tabs have consistently tested as ~100ug, (+/-10ug) in like three different tests submitted by completely different people?
i guess this goes with the last paragraph i just wrote, but i have a hard time accepting as definitive proof what seems to be a relatively small sample of the vendor's offerings.
i appreciate your concerns, and they're things that pop into my mind all the time when deciding what or from whom i should buy, but i feel very comfortable with what i have. might i have doses that are significantly underdosed? could be. but they get me to where i want to go, and i like the price i paid for them so i'm not going to sweat it.