Okay, let me try to tell you why this is plain wrong:

Don't pay any attention to the buthurts saying it's not Arch. It is.

https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Arch_Linux#Principles Based on the Principles alone, it's not Arch Linux.

Quote from antergos.com:

Essentials Included

Antergos includes everything you need. Its default configuration provides you with a ready-to-use system. No additional steps are required after installation. You’ll be able to surf the web, listen to music, watch videos, and do anything else you like. Simply reboot your system and enjoy.

This is exactly the opposite than Arch:

Arch is installed as a minimal base system, configured by the user upon which their own ideal environment is assembled by installing only what is required or desired for their unique purposes.

They are elitist pricks upset that there is an easier way to install it.

Nope, we just care about people so much that we actually try to make them understand the whole point why Arch Linux exists in the first place. Arch is supposed to be a Community of people who know their systems inside out, which Antergos is really the opposite from.

Let me do it even more simple: You have a Product, lets call it A. This product is a collection of materials that you can use to create, lets say, a car.

You will support customers who need to get help on how to use these blocks.

Now someone else creates a Product B, based on your materials. But he doesn't like the colors, he changes the size slightly and also puts a new branding and throws a lot of other tweaks into it.

Should you as owner of Product A now have to support all customers of Product B?

Why are people so headstrong when it comes to this. It's just unfair what people ask from the Arch Community.