> Calling it a "story problem" isn't an excuse to substitute hamfisted metaphors for argument.

Mathematical proofs use metaphors all the fucking time. You're just making excuses because you don't know how to refute them.

> It is also a reason to believe you are still in high school.

Your inability to actually refute what I said is reason to believe you never started high school in the first place.

> The only way **you would get proportional representation** with a fixed cutoff would be to change the cutoff.

Except the proportion of black people in elite universities is nowhere close to representative, which means that we have no reason to believe the cutoff has changed.

It would be like claiming, "The only way to have a 100% correlation between autism and vaccines is if vaccines caused autism," and then ignoring the fact that the 100% correlation doesn't actually exist.

> In your billionaire example you don't have proportional representation

Yes, just like we don't have proportional representative in elite colleges. Which I already explained to you numerous times, dumbass.