You're mistaking cooperation for service. They're not synonymous. When you hand over money as legal tender, that could be purely cooperative. The consequence for not cooperating would be legal action taken against you. In a StS society, people do their work, because they have to, or because they see it as a means for self-promotion, not because they desire to serve others.

I'm not sure why you're using animal agricultural to make your point about polarities. Humans, in the first place, are not a StO race. They are largely <50% StO, meaning mostly negative. Using humans as an example of a StO race that treats other creatures or outgroups with disdain or indifference is thus invalid. Humans, if they were to truly be enlightened in StO polarity, would treat animals with far greater care and reverence.

Whether North Korea is a StO society no one knows. They certainly retain some aspects of it, despite the totalitarian regime's best efforts to keep them in fear mode.

Your first paragraph seems to be refuting a strawman. Ra doesn't suggest StS 4th density societies are those that would wantonly kill each other, although no doubt some acts of killing do occur, including wars. Ra also never suggested that they possess 0% StO. They may very well retain some vestiges of StO distortions. Their use of punishment, according to Ra, is merely for those higher in their hierarchy to maintain control. They are far more interested in using each other for their own self-serving goals, than killing each other. Highly StS-polarized entities are very disciplined and intelligent. Wanton killing is an idiotic and undisciplined act, and is more a hallmark of confused (>50% and <95% StS) entities.

"...the fact that there are whole 5d societies serving the self shows they still have a sophisticated organization."

5th density negative entities do not live in societies. They go solo, according to Ra. It's only in 4th density do negative entities still require a social complex for their learning.

I think you should study the materials more. It's fine to refute or deny Ra, but misrepresenting their messages is only muddying the waters for others.