Maybe you should answer some simple questions.

You seem to believe that, despite the fact that politicians are notoriously untrustworthy and prone to the abuse of power, they would be trustworthy with this power. Why do you believe that?

My hypothesis is that you know that your beliefs are unfounded, and aren't answering the questions because then you'd have to admit that your entire line of thinking is based on nothing but irrational, unfounded naivete and overwhelming ignorance.

Because votes are tradeable, a candidate with no money or party can still get a few votes and put them to good use.

Does that mean you're finally admitting that the power isn't with the voters?