Atheist dilemma: logic itself

...But atheists (especially materialism) need to explain them without describing them as transcendent since that seems to imply a transcendent law giver

No, in your generalization, the laws of logic are axioms. Everyone realizes that the laws of logic are axioms because they confirm to reality. Nothing about that implies s law giver. That is a presupposition. That is assuming your conclusion.

So atheists deny that the laws of logic are “real” because they are just description

Um what? Are you projecting here?

This doesn’t make sense to me.

That makes sense. You started off with flawed thinking then you followed it up with a flawed conclusion.

Like things still are what they are even if no one was around to describe that.

/r/DebateAnAtheist Thread