huh? never be proof?

you are saying: if you are agnostic then you believe that there will never be proof.

is this because you are agnostic? or what?

waiting for proof? or disproof?

unprovable?

not possible?

dude, i sort of get what you are saying... but... well.. it's kinda crooked. doesn't quite jive.

it's not "waiting for shit" like some little wuss pining for his lover.

waiting? WTF.

interested to see if someone proofs or disproofs it, but waiting? hell, there's a shit ton of fun stuff out there to do.

"The boundary between atheism and agnosticism is crossed to me when you're not just waiting for more conclusive evidence, but realize that conclusive evidence is simply not possible."

was a better example.. i might add the phrase "at this space and time."

saying that it will never be provable false or true is... an assumption that is not logical as... there is information we do not know... uncertainty.

The whole idea of the scientific method, is to NEVER ASSUME. work both sides of the equation.

waiting?

dude, you had it with the last sentance... but that waiting stuff bugs the crap out of me for some reason. sorry.