ATTN: Patton Oswalt is NOT a pedo—his 2013 tweet came after a site mistook a photo of him for a convicted pedophile (he vowed to lose weight). This is NOT how research should work, folks.

I dont know why anyone here would pretend Hollywood isnt filled with sexual predators, or that the industries of politics and banking aren't the same way (i thought we were past such naivete)... But whom does that help when we know these industries are in fact filled with predators and we stifle research? Why definitively assert that he is clean? Are you 100% sure of this? If one may not declare him guilty, then why can one decree his complete innocence at this point? In a court, the allegations are levelled. Person is indicted or not. Then there is the DISCOVERY PHASE! Why hamper the discovery phase? Are you saying you alone are refusing to allow us to "indict" this ham sandwich so as to allow for people to do their own discovery (research) and make up their own minds? There is a way to deal with posts of a purportedly controversial nature, upvotes and downvotes. If the community upvotes it to the front page, I'd say that seems like a consensus to me.

If we're wrong, so what? Then you can sticky a retraction to apologize to the hollywood types (who have nothing but disdain for you). "They" already want this board taken down. Be loud. They aren't just going to be nice all of the sudden or leave the Great Awakening to grow and prosper now because people here cut Patton Oswalt a break.

I understand your desire to keep this sub clean so as to avoid to ire of Cuck Sp3z; however, we cannot avoid a topic that may be controversial. Everything we discuss on this sub is controversial.

/r/greatawakening Thread