Audience laughs at male domestic abuse victom

Their points are not logical at all, are you serious? I'll go through them one by one:

  • To arbitrarily reassign a child's primary caregiver, or disrupt a child's attachment to a primary caregiver creates an unstable, even traumatic situation for the children.

This is ridiculous. First, women are not always the primary caregiver. Second, just because a MARRIED COUPLE has an arrangement while they are married does not mean that a divorced father doesn't deserve equal time with his kids. They made the decision that was best for their family at the time.

  • Increased father involvement does not necessarily result in positive outcomes for children. This involvement by the father will have positive consequences only when it is the arrangement of choice for the particular family and when there is a relatively cooperative and low conflict relationship between the parents.

Are you serious? This is irrelevant. Fathers are parents too and they deserve equal time with their children.

  • In families where there is a high level of conflict between the mother and father, joint custody arrangements are harmful to children, placing them in the middle of ongoing bickering and a stressful, unstable environment with no escape."

So, because men and women sometimes argue...women should be default primary care providers because....why exactly?

  • Where there is domestic violence, joint custody/shared parenting arrangements are NEVER appropriate.

Courts already consider this. This doesn't need to be stated and is irrelevant to normal situations.

The fact that you think these reasons seems logical is pretty appalling. None of those are good reasons.

/r/videos Thread Parent Link - mirror.co.uk