Because if Scottish wasn't on there then by default I'd tick British.

But British was available on the census form. You seem to be really struggling here to explain yourself. Pay attention you fucking spoon.

You can't possibly think that's the kind of identity we've been talking about here.

Identity is about how you identify yourself. People from Scotland and England both identify with their respected nationalities.You claimed that regional identity was , yet the census form still shows people identifying as English. You have repeated yourself that the exclusion of a regional identity makes this point redundant, but surely if the E

Except it's not the most accurate when it comes to what we're actually discussing, because as I've pointed out several times now, but you're apparently too fucking thick to take it in, regional identities are not an option on the census form.

It's hilarious how hard you are trying to ignore your earlier posts!

It's irrelevant whether or not regional identities were included. You suggested that regional identities meant the English identity was fading. Yet people are still self-identifying as English when they can just choose British.

Your own words w

You said:

The overriding 'English' identity has faded over the last century or so

Yet you cannot explain why people are still self-identifying as just English, equal to the amount of Scots identifying as just Scottish! You have floundered around trying to make excuses for your own inability to do this. Regardless of whether or not people are embracing a regional identity, it isn't impacting their decision to identify as just English! The next time you start a conversation with me, read the article you are responding to and then try and think about what argument you are actually trying to make. You are a simpleton of the most pathetic type I have ever