No, you started using personal attacks - including comparing skeptics of the "official" report to something more ignorant than a "retarded dog" - and claiming there is nothing to the idea that this event may have been staged.

It doesn't really seem, to me, that you have even begun going over the alleged evidence presented against the "official" report, because if you had you might actually have specific points to make refuting that evidence. Instead, you've become increasingly insulting and have clung more and more tightly to the idea that:

This will seem like a rare or confusing concept if you've never left the house, but it's really not. It's real life: If a building is crowded and/or has interior doors that are locked (both of which we know were true of the firehouse on that day) it can be the only way to get from point a to point b: leave the building and go back inside through the other door.

Yes, bravo, you have described a particular situation that does in fact occur in real life. However, there is nothing pointing to the building being too crowded to walk through. People walk in and out of the doors closest to the camera footage (and aimlessly walk outside of it), and there is a pretty visible line of people weirdly and quickly moving back into the building after casually walking up the road away from the camera footage. That is suspicious. If you don't find that suspicious, that is fine, but there is a mountain of other evidence you aren't refuting. Even if you had proven this particular claim to be false, you certainly didn't point out that our "beliefs" (not really the proper term here, in my opinion) make no sense.

So, yes. How rude of you.