I thought we were talking about bras.
I mean if you want to invoke my identity, sure, you have my post history.
I'm reading the wikipedia about bra fashion.
Fashion
Patti Page wearing a bullet bra, 1955
While there are medical and surgical needs for brassieres, most are worn for fashion or cultural reasons.[4] Women's choices about what bra to wear are consciously and unconsciously affected by social perceptions of the ideal female body shape, which changes over time.[62] As lingerie, bras are also about expressing female sex appeal and expressions of sexual fantasy. Bras are also used to make a statement as evidenced by Jean Paul Gautier's designs and Madonna's Blond Ambition Tour.[63]
In the 1920s in the United States, the fashion was to flatten the breasts as typified in the flapper era. During the 1940s and 1950s, the sweater girl became fashionable, supported by a bullet bra (known also as a torpedo or cone bra) as worn by Jane Russell and Patti Page.[64] In the early 1960s, smaller breasts gained popularity, and in the late 1990s larger breasts became more fashionable.[50] Iris Marion Young described preferences in the United States in 1990: "round, sitting high on the chest, large but not bulbous, with the look of firmness." This is regarded as contradictory in several ways.[65]
As outerwear, bras in the form of bikini tops in the 1950s became the acceptable public display in modern times.[63] During the 1960s, designers and manufacturers introduced padded and underwire bras. After the Miss America protest in September 1968, manufacturers were concerned that women would stop wearing bras. In response, many altered their marketing and claimed that wearing their bra was like "not wearing a bra".[66] In the 1970s women sought more comfortable and natural-looking bras.[64]
Victoria's Secret commissions a fantasy bra every fall. In 2003 it hired the jeweller Mouawad to design one containing more than 2500 carats of diamonds and sapphires; valued at US$10 million, it was the world's most valuable bra at the time.[67]
Is this article just wrong?