>The intelligence agencies then sought to learn whether the Trump campaign was colluding with the Russians on the hacking or other efforts to influence the election.
>The officials interviewed in recent weeks said that, so far, they had seen no evidence of such cooperation.
Seems important to note and basically neutralises the headline.
Also we have already heard most of this information from "anonymous intelligence officials" and this article itself seems to be quite purposely vague in order to get a good headline. It's amazing seeing the deep state trying to subvert the democratic election through these leaks with no evidence being put forward. If they have proof, they should show actual transcripts.
edit: Note how similar this article to this one which was written one month ago by the same organisation, same writers and worst of all has the same information (except that the times now has records but still hasn't proven collusion, etc.).