Running in a race and in the street is not the same as running it on track, but it is a hell of a lot more similar than boxing compared to actual fighting.
Lol it doesn't matter, you can try to rationalize it all you want, your argument is the epitome of stupidity in that Batman can't beat someone at boxing simply because he isn't primarly a boxer
Fighting has three phases: the free movement phase, the clinch face, and the ground phase. the boxing is much less dynamic than an actual fight.
3 phases in which a comic book character would massively out perform a real life human being, you're not helping yourself here
Upon a quenching, the ref separates the boxers. So please don't try and make an analogy between sprinting and 200 yard dash and a boxing match.
You're under the assumption that a fight would actually last this long when Tyson would literally be put in a coma after getting hit once,
Now we get to your one boxing feat that you mention. I can give you virtually hundreds of Tyson's.
I gave you a quality feat against a character that's superhuman, you can give hundreds of Tysons matches which would be garbage, you're trying to argue quantity vs quality. Having a match with a character like Wildcat would be better than having hundreds if not thousands of matches against garbage fighters who would literally be decapitated after getting hit by someone like Wildcat
So plain and simply, you can in no way say that Batman has more boxing feats and than Mike Tyson.
Just like saying Cap has no more track feats than Usain Bolt but would literally finish a race 10x over before Bolt finished once, your logic is again the epitome of idiocy
And if you claim to adhere to the feat system, then you must concede that Batman loses to Tyson at boxing.
Maybe if I had a severe case of brain damage, no, even then I logically couldn't come up with that conclusion
Ignoring the awful quantity over quality argument your presenting, how exactly is Tyson going to survive a boxing match when he
A) Can't hurt his opponent B) Can't hit his opponent C) Can't survive getting hit by his opponent
You can rationalize as much as you want but you until you can get around these 3 obstacles your argument of ignorance is still one massive failure.