no, that's not the reason why iron items are worst than rune???? that was a horrible comparison because they aren't even close to the same tier. even items on the same tier will be useless because of other items. you're argument is ridiculous tbh and you're saying to buff a bunch of high tier armors will sell the game?

What a way to preface your post. Yes, having attractive-looking pieces of content shown to other people is actually a pretty good way of selling out your game. Who knew?

listen bro the Barrows set affect has been the same for years and no one cares about torags effect. It's useless set effect does nothing to the community. it's used as a tank armor.

Appeal to tradition, also known as argumentum ad antiquitatem, a logical fallacy. As you noted the set bonus is useless, hence why there is a good, logical, and valid reason for a change.

all i'm saying is that not all high tier armor needs to serve a purpose or be as great as the same armor in its tier. ahrims and especially karils set effect is practically useless. but it's other pieces are almost best in slot for the middle class community. (who can't afford armadyl and ancestral.

There are good reasons for giving Torag's a set effect, all of which have an objectively positive effect on the game. Im sorry you are not able to see that, but I noted them in my post, so feel free to read that.

As for being "as great as other armour in it's tier," I've already noted in my post that it won't be as great as Dharok's.

Generally though you want to have every weapon and armour to have a somewhat similar power level and consistency, otherwise there'd be no point in having them in the same tier.