So they "play far better than their MSRP", especially if we ignore the fact that they don't. Cool, I'm with you 100% of the way.

I'd love to post a deck that beats the 2016 precons, or a 100$+ decklist, or another undefined deck in 1v1 or whatever Schrodinger's constraints you'll throw up next, but I'm not sure if I have to build it under 35$ or 100$ or the price that you mention in your next post, whatever that may be. I'm sure whatever I post will be a "retarded gimmick" because I'm "full of shit," but if it makes you feel better, it will run more rare lands than it has colors.

Luckily, I don't have to post one, since it's "irrelevant" whether I can do so, and how I did so "means birdshit."

At this point, besides cursing me out more, I'm not even sure what you're trying to prove.

I've built several EDH decks that tappedout tells me are worth under 35-40$. They tend to beat precons.

can't provide evidence to support this

dodges the demands for proof like Marchesa dodges removal

I'm trying to prove that you people complaining about how a 35 dollar deck isn't good enough have zero ground to stand on. So far, nothing you've said has provided evidence to the contrary. You've merely tried to discredit my claims by nitpicking my argument. The only thing I'm arguing is that you've failed to successfully argue anything.