The main reason why I disagree with this, is because I have realised that the only real point of it is the destruction of words and ideas, and the limiting of what we are permitted to think and say. Any other claimed subtext for it, should be recognised for what it is; a lie. That includes the destruction of statues, and any other form of censorship, vandalism, or desecration which is claimed to be justified by a sick, hypocritical, dishonest sense of righteousness.

You might claim to be morally offended by the use of the word "master," but I consider that a lie. I have never encountered a single advocate of censorship who I considered genuinely compassionate; and the desire, in and of itself, for anything to entirely cease to exist because it happens to be something which you don't like, is evidence of narcissistic sociopathy.