Honestly, do you mean "liberal" as in what is more broadly a facet of broader Conservativism and not "liberal" as in the popular US vernacular to mean left leaning, or socialist?
If the 1st, then that should better be defined to mean No fucking "conservatives" on the sub. Modern conservatism being nothing more than an interpretation of monarchism and theocratic ideation. That is as expressed through what is currently the seemingly the more popular "flavor" as far as Maistre's "Latin conservatism" goes which in its modern context if nothing more than mean by which fascism is enabled under a given "throne and altar".
As better explained by F. Wilhoit with the following;
https://www.goodreads.com/author/quotes/20632851.Frank_Wilhoit
This also means that to them there must always be a permanent and lesser exploitable underclass of peoples in an "out group" who must serve at the behest of their "betters" in the protected and insular "ingroup".
If that sounds familiar its because its capitalism 101 as enables by fascism, monarchism, and theocratic ideation in practice.
Being said the people described above have all but abandoned all facets of "liberalism" as a conservative ideology as it stands as being part of what John Locke as a parliamentarian got in to and what has been at the core of classical conservatism going way back. Modern conservatives hate liberalism of this type too mind you as it relies on equal utilization/application of rule of law in governance, and not just selectively the preferred "in groups" at the expense of the "outgroups" in question.
While Liberalism in the sense of what Locke got in to does still involve private property matters etc. figure it is not really a problem at its face, and even far left ideologies rely on a lot of the core principles he explored way back when.(see "Social liberal theory" and how it influences many people including Marx.) What we ought to have a problem with are alternate versions of "conservative" ideation which stemmed from it in the form of "anachro-capitalism", "laissez-faire capitalism", etc.. which are nothing more than means by which the longer spiel above are pursued/enabled through abstraction.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Liberalism
Now, if you are talking about Liberal" with US popular vernacular to mean left leaning, or leftist... Yah, there is no problem there. Hell Even John Locke's flavor of Liberalism as far as how it relates to things such as latter Social liberal theory is no problem at all.