Even if Ti is more than merely noticing logical inconsistencies (which of course it is), no one ever said it wasn’t. So what’s the point of trying to correct something no one ever stated? Your response here looks like a straw man.

Ti is clearly more than noticing logical inconsistencies. The point here was to provide an idea of how Ti works — not to provide an exhaustive idea of the function in its entirety. Hence, it appears you got the wrong idea.

Further, how could you possibly attempt to type someone based on two comments they’ve made? You do realize that’s extremely error-prone, right? And on top of that, it’s incredibly presumptuous. I’ve typed as a strongly preferenced INTP (with high Ti) consecutively for years. So I’m pretty sure I’m not an Fi user. But thanks for assuming, anyway.