Can someone explain why abridging the freedom of speech is OK but infringing on firearms ownership is wrong?

Dang man, you are quite combative.

Quit being a strawmanning retard and I wouldn't be.

I wanted to know how far you believed in “shall not be infringed”

Exactly as the Founding Fathers wrote it.

People all over this sub use it to justify that anyone should be able to own firearms, including the mentally ill.

Do you have any compelling reason why all mentally ill people, no matter what it is, should have a blanket denial of rights? No you don't.

I wanted to know what your position was.

No you don't. If you did you wouldn't have made an entirely bullshit comparison of the act of peacefully owning guns to deliberately inciting violence and child porn.

/r/progun Thread Parent