China database lists 'breedready' status of 1.8 million women

We also know that the legal justification for antitrust was redefined by Robert Bork and accepted by legislators and courts - if it doesn't appear to hurt consumer welfare, it doesn't get broken up. The government and companies knowing too much about you doesn't make avocados more expensive, and in some cases - shopper loyalty cards - could make them cheaper. There's no legal precedent for breaking up companies because they have monopsony power over wages, and Amazon could easily say "We help the consumer by providing a marketplace for millions of sellers to compete" - which they do.

Antitrust did not envision the modern form of international platforms, simply because it used to be too big and expensive for anyone but the government to provide them.

/r/news Thread Parent Link - theguardian.com