No True Scotsman only works for superfluous things that have nothing to do with the noun itself.
You ignored my 2nd to last sentence which was this.
So they want to call themselves Christian while not believing in Christian theism.
I guess you and I disagree on what Christian theism means, you think Jesus was only divinely inspired when talking about eating a cracker and ignoring everything else, I think it's worshiping the entire Old and New Testament like Jesus says.
Jesus was divinely inspired
Jesus says the entire Bible is true https://www.biblegateway.com/quicksearch/?qs_version=NIV&quicksearch=word%20of%20god[1]
The Old Testament doesn't count
Jesus disagrees https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Matthew+5:17&version=NIV[2]
Also if you disagree, you have to renounce the 10 commandments and Genesis
Disproving myths doesn't disprove history, bub.
History is still a witness account, I'm sure you wouldn't believe a modern witness account of someone flying to the moon without technology. If you would, speaks for itself.
Barack Obama could be Jesus
We're talking about the divine. There's a 0 percent chance that it's real in the first place, now let's see the parallels Jesus and another lifedeathrebirth god namely Horus. http://rishyrich.hubpages.com/hub/Parallels-between-Jesus-Horus
Tacitus
Richard Carrier said his main reason for doubting the authenticity of the passage comes from the fact that the original manuscript reading of the name of the group persecuted by Nero is Chrestiani
Looks like interpolation, the same which was done to Josephus's work. Other than that you have no one, the rest of the time Paul did all the evangelizing.
why do you discount this one and not the DOZENS of others?
This one did miracles and sounds concocted out of someone's (Paul's) imagination.
There's more sources for Jesus than Alexander the Great
Since the 18th century scholars have attempted to reconstruct the life of the historical Jesus, developing historical-critical methods for analysing the available texts. The only sources are documentary; in conjunction with Biblical texts such as the Pauline Letters and the synoptic Gospels, three passages in non-Christian works have been used to support the historicity of Jesus: two in the writings of the Jewish historian Josephus, and one from the Roman historian Tacitus. Although the authenticity of all three has been questioned, and one is generally accepted as having been altered by Christians, most scholars believe they are at least partially authentic.
Alexander the Great has only a few sources
More than Jesus's 2 crap ones. They are also actual sources, unbiased historical in depth ones. For example Plutarch's Life of Alexander is an entire book written about him.
Basically, New T is just as much a myth as the Old T, and by calling the Old T a myth, by the same criteria they are admitting they're following mythology and thus only eat a cracker because it's fun. Assuming they are naturalists but still want a god they are reduced to the God of the gaps and are ipso facto deists.