Why do we have CIA, NSA, FBI, ATF, DEA, and HOMELAND SECURITY. Wouldn't it be more efficient to just have one agency?

Some and some. There are different functions of the agencies.

The FBI is, to my understanding, a federal police force. It exists to provide a single, unified command structure and police presence in cases of national importance, or where jurisdictional boundaries may be fuzzy. That makes sense in a federal nation.

The CIA, however, is an intelligence and counter-intelligence agency. It exists to gather information on foreign powers, and to attempt to root out foreign spies within the USA. To underscore - it is not a police force, and the role it fills is very different to normal policing. There may be some cross-over with the FBI in the realm of counter-intelligence - you would need to arrest and question spies on domestic soil - but the intelligence part has no cross-over at all. Personally, I feel it makes more sense to have counter-intelligence and intelligence within the same organizational structure, so I'd have the CIA and FBI as separate.

The NSA is basically just electronic spying and cyberdefense. Why, exactly, that isn't handled by the regular intelligence forces I don't know. However, having the cyber-stuff separate seems to be standard - it is in the UK as well, and as far as I know, the same is true in Russia, Canada, Australia, France, Germany, and China. (Not 100% sure on all of those, but I'm fairly confident).

The ATF and DEA do seem unnecessary to me. Obviously, the agents themselves are required and perform an important function (as an aside, I'd personally legalize drugs; it's a different issue, and although it wouldn't negate the need for drug enforcement, it would change their role). However, I don't see why that role couldn't be fulfilled by agents employed by a subdivision of another agency - probably the FBI. So I agree there.

Homeland Security... I'm actually not certain what that does, if I'm honest. I know it was created after 9/11, and it's anti-terrorism. I don't really understand why the new department was created though (especially by a small-government conservative, but that's another issue). As I don't really know about it, I can't comment.

I agree that it would be more efficient to have fewer organizations. It would also be cheaper, and probably improve intelligence gathering. However, as I mentioned, some of the agencies you mentioned aren't entirely compatible. If I were setting up a country, I think I would strip your list down to two or three agencies (FBI, with DEA and ATF subsets; CIA, with NSA subset; and possibly Homeland Security, depending what it actually does).

Hope I helped, a bit.

/r/AskReddit Thread