So this is actually really interesting now.
One of these points is very clearly the odd one out. It's totally inconsistent with your other views. Can you spot which one it is? And then, can you spot the only thing that differentiates that point in this case from the other 2?
I'll spell it out for you: you support protection of freedom and armed defence of self/property if the subject is white. And you do not support those same rights for our black victim.
"If you're black and people threaten you or your property, just lay down and be a good little victim". You can edit that into your OP if you want?