That's not an argument (for your apparent belief) that simply voting that a behavior/feeling is an illness is scientific evidence of any illness.
Who said it was an argument? It was a statement, you have a serious problem. Not everyone is trying to argue with you
Really such voting shows the moral subjective opinion of whatever violent mob controls the APA. And moral opinion (eg which alleged feelings/behaviors are good or bad) is not science.
Ok, i honestly dont care
Thank you for surrendering the debate. The fact the computer is not used by the parasitic monopolist profiteers of today is not surprising- it would make health care cheaper. But a computer like this is in use for some (but not all) drugs.
Lol, what debate? you are debating with yourself, im not interested in debating science.
Since you assert:
he fact the computer is not used by the parasitic monopolist profiteers of today is not surprising- it would make health care cheaper.
What is stopping "non parasitic monopolists" such as yourself from developing that computer? Why havent you and people like you created it?
It's a whole different topic, but "business majors" should not be a real thing. It's just subjective opinion.
Why should they not exist? How is accounting subjective opinion: please explain and be specific. So are you saying that something thats subjective opinion should not exist? Why not, who gets to decide what should exist and what shouldnt. Why would you want to ban things you disagree with? Seems more like a dictatorship
If some knowledge is not the result of repeatable physical experimentation (ie with physical units of measurement & thus accuracy/repeatability) it's just subjective opinion.
Ok, so cost accounting is not subjective opinion, unless you feel otherwise.
Note: i would really hate to live under your dictatorship, people like you are why people are so scared of communism. Your drive to impose your beliefs on others is so strong.