I'm talking about whether it is ontological possible for a woman to represent Christ. If not, then the logical conclusion is that Christ did not assume the humanity of women in his incarnation.

Once again, Western dualistic thought is one of the greatest plagues mankind has ever seen. No, it does not follow that Christ does not represent women because women cannot be priests. Since when are priests the only representation of Jesus Christ??? Are not all believers representative of Jesus Christ? That's literally what being a Christian means! Why didn't Jesus choose any female disciples? And why on earth did Paul say that women should be submissive and keep silent in church? Where is the talk of female priests in the Bible? Why did literally no one have female priests until the 1970s?

This is exactly the issue up for debate though.

It is not up for debate! The Bible literally says that sodomites should be put to death. Given this, you would think Jesus would have said something about how we need to stop treating this perfectly good thing as an abomination, right? He did not say a single word! All of Christianity has condemned sodomite unions until the 1970s. You are literally crazy if you think there is any debate.

Your "tradition" is nothing more than a man-made joke. No wonder the Episcopalian Church will be extinct by 2050. Good riddance to bad rubbish!