You misquoted me.

I said:

... implemented social distancing, vaccination, and border controls in almost 200 countries ...

meaning:

implemented social distancing in almost 200 countries

vaccines in almost 200 countries

and border controls in almost 200 countries

It was a parallel, comma delimited list where the end applies to each element of the list.

Even if you take them as individual statements.

The provinces implemented social distancing, not the federal government.

The provinces implemented most vaccine mandates (other than for federal employers), not the federal government.

The federal government implemented similar border controls to most countries.

So not only did you misquote me but you were wrong when you answered because you worship Trudeau and think he does all kinds of things that he doesn't do. It's weird.

So, you either misinterpreted what I said (is English not your native language?) or you disingenuously misquoted me to strengthen your weak argument and now you're moaning about me being disingenuous because I corrected your disingenuous misquoting of my original message.

LMFAOOO, it’s not ad hominem to literally point out that you misquoted me and are arguing a boogie man POV right now. Please touch grass.

Ad Hominem - Typically, this term refers to a rhetorical strategy where the speaker attacks the character, motive, or some other attribute of the person making an argument rather than addressing the substance of the argument itself.

Where in your last response did you address the argument itself?

Come back when you're serious about having a discussion.