Yeah that all follows. Women have a better pick of the litter pre-marriage, and likely pair up with someone of their own status as they age and become "less" desirable. This is then a solid argument that women aren't victims of age-discrimination, and that instead it's more that when they age the standards become equal rather than the bias usually displayed to upper lower tier of attractive women all the way to the tip top.

Now, on the flip side, it may still be true that the bottom 5% of women have it tougher than the bottom 5% of men, but the bottom 5% of women make up a quarter of what 80% of all men would consider "enough" so it would require a more in depth look at the bottom 5%, that would likely be too subjective a standard to have any objectivity. Perhaps with 100 different "testers" for the bottom 5% of women.

Anyways, as someone who doesn't identify as an incel, I did find that data fascinating, and enjoyed the depth the author went to. It also examined something I've found interesting, the "sexconomy," and I found the results not surprising as far as the total effect, but I did find extremely shocking as far as the intensity of that effect.

I think an even better look at the data, and what would be an interesting avenue for this community to explore as evidence of the male genders openness, would be how trans-individuals fair on social dating apps. I would wager, that openly trans women who identify as straight (MtF who is attracted to men) would fair better than openly trans-men (FtM who is attracted to women).

And, it's not even subject to the subjectivity of "attractiveness." It's an objective identifier you can use.