Based on what information? If you're just marginalizing a concern based on your own disinterest, that's fine, but let's not pretend this is strictly ex gluteus if you can't back it up?
If you want to make it your cause, that's fine and I wish you luck. I'm just pointing out it's a pet cause of the American right wing.
That's absolute bullshit, and you should be fucking ashamed of yourself for such blatant unjustified defamation.
Look, I can called myself a vegan but if I start going on about the benefits of eating buffalo I sure as hell don't sound like a vegan, or am at least pretty selective about what my beliefs apply to.
When have I ever, for one instant, downplayed the injustice against women (or anybody fucking else).
When you said Wu was asking for it. And then doubled down on that statement when you were called out for it.
Would you do that for your opposition? Nero's certainly been fucking harassed. He's a fucking minority - would you extend that privilege to him?
Yes. Because I will not accept any rationalization or excuse for harassment.
I'm bisexual, and I've been harassed online related to GamerGate - do I get a license as well?
I dunno, do I get to speculate on whether or not you're a professional victim?
Sarcasm aside, do you not see how that works as a silencing tactic? Policing a victim's response to being victimized is one of the oldest ones in the book.
I've never ONCE, for one moment, given any fucking heed to any argument that the people I've mentioned as victims of harassment are in fact victimizers as well.
There's plenty of actual shit I have said and done to actually insult or defame me without making shit up.
Ah, forgive me. I lost the thread of the sentence when I glanced through it. As you say, it's something one gets to be rather sensitive about.
Morally, the crime is roughly the same - preying on people's sense of giving to pay yourself, but economies of scale wasn't what I was talking about.
Uh, no it's not. One is vastly more immoral because it has vastly more effect.
She's presented comprehensive financial disclosure records, both to us, and to meet the requirements for protection under 501(3)(c). Admittedly, it's not legally binding, but she's stated that from her kickstarter, she paid herself a salary of less then 8 percent, and from her Feminist Frequency funding, a bit more then 6 percent, a sum total of just over $45,000 since 2012.
I don't what she charges as corporate expenses, but they've carried over more then enough of their 2014 funding to make me not question her in the slightest. From every bit of information I can gleam, she's legit and there's no reason to question otherwise.
And yes, I think she's been a victim of terrible and unjustified harassment.
So the only ethical way to, as you say, 'bilk the tragedy' of her harassment is disclose her finances? That's an...entertaining view, unless I've gotten your logic wrong somewhere along the line.