No, I was a child in the early 90's. I'm also currently a graduate student in Political Science.

Voting to authorize force is voting for the war in Iraq. She voted to authorize military action, that's voting for the war. It shouldn't matter if she was voting in line with her constituents, or was provided bad intel. She voted for it...and clearly, her voting for it as a Senator, regardless of how you'd like to spin it, is more impactful that Trump simply "supporting" it in an interview as a non-government official.

The DNC leak was a major story on every news outlet. She was involved because she publicly backed Shultz (who was corresponding with her campaign) and hired her after she stepped down. That clearly involves her.

Her lying about her bout for pneumonia was a story, and is important. It shows she's willing to lie to the American people; which is one of her biggest arguments against Trump. If you lie about something so minor, it may imply you are willing to lie about something more major; very relative to a political campaign.

The FBI did not "disagree" that it was a "crime". The FBI report 100% stated that a federal crime, and many regulation violations, were factually committed by Hillary and her staff. They decided not to indite because she did not "consciously intend to a commit a crime" in other words, her actions "held no malice" (look of "Mens Rea" if you need help). This means she did it, and it was a crime, but because she didn't mean to do it, she's not being punished...but she still did it, and it's still a crime. That is not debated by anyone by you apparently.

This is why I usually refrain from discussing politics on reddit and typically keep to sports. You're wildly wrong, yet you go and try to insult me by calling me a child.