I find this to be a common refrain from feminists, blue pillers, and others of a similar ilk. The underlying implication is that there's nothing wrong with society, nothing wrong with feminism, and if these men are acting out, it's because there's something wrong with them as individuals.
It's always nice to have a bank of articles with which to head off these kind of 'divide-and-rule', laying the blame at the feet of individual men, type strategies.
http://opinionator.blogs.nytimes.com/2013/02/02/the-boys-at-the-back/?_r=1
http://www.weeklystandard.com/Content/Public/Articles/000/000/016/659dkrod.asp
But red pill are no better, they will actually try to argue against political mobilisation for equality. Just like feminists, they mostly want to buttress gender norms, except from the opposite, male-advantageous, direction. If they were going out 'peacocking' in skrts they might be more interesting, but IMO they have neither the will to dismantle gender norms for men, nor the imagination to invent ineteresting new ones (as gay men did).
Another aspect of this which should also be striking is that, by their own admission, The Blue Pill forum (and others like it) are set up as a satire - to basically make a big joke out of the issues here and to actively go out of their way to taunt individuals they already believe to be mentally unstable. They seem to revel in belittling, demeaning, insulting, and making sport of people and minimizing their problems as insignificant or just not worthy of any sympathy. They're dismissed as "whiners," as if they couldn't possibly have any real problems, since they're "privileged" males.
Agree with this though, what is the name for this 'superiority' reaction to RP's inferiority complex? Reaction formation? Why do blue pill even care??