I don't think so. Not according to his post: "Violent riots by Black Lives Matter and Antifa extremists in Kenosha, Wisconsin late Tuesday evening reportedly came to a preemptive halt when armed vigilantes, who have been accused by the left of being militia members, opened fire on the extremists, killing two and injuring at least one."
Really a classic example. ""Violent riots by Black Lives Matter and Antifa extremists." So, protesters are labeled "extremists," participating in "violent riots." When the reality is the demonstrations were marked by daily peaceful protesting followed by confrontations with law enforcement and rioting at night.
While the, I assume, white people who opened fire on the "extremists," killing two and injuring at least one, are softly labeled as "armed vigilantes, who have been accused by the left of being militia members." So, they don't even want to really call the murderer a "militia member"--that appears too harsh. But they do appear to be okay with the term "vigilante."
By the way, the murderer in this case is being charged with first-degree intentional homicide. So much for just being a vigilante.