Yet, here again, you throw accusations, accuse me of being willfully dense, passive aggressive. Which one us is the combative one here friend. Just because someone disagrees with you doesn't mean they are coming at you or being vicious or blood thirsty.

Beyond that I'm not saying the content wasn't originally planned I am saying the dlc wasn't and using the cut area as dlc wasn't planned. Miyazaki confirmed that, after the fact, they went pack and decided to put it in. When DLC is planned you can see hints of it to draw the player in and make them wonder, take kiln of the first flame in 3, you can see the dreg heap. It was something to bait you.

Beyond that, it's arguing semantics. If you are saying I come off as combative, and passive aggressive, I say you come off as whiny cunt who can't handle someone disagreeing with you. so cheers, we're done here. (ps, I was being combative there, just so you can learn the difference)