Why don't the Chinese see the bullshit that their government puts them through?

To address the first point: I obviously type top to bottom. I didn't expect to write that much when I started, and it's too late for me to care much.

Literally all it takes is hitting the enter key on the keyboard twice to start a new line, it's not that complicated.

As for everything else, I'd need to look at where those troops were deployed, I don't want to call you a liar, but I don't want to take your word for it either.

Here, I'll make it even easier for you. It was Syria . They went to Syria.

As for Trump being an asshole, it doesn't disqualify him from working his hardest to benefit this country.

Except we know he isn't. Past presidents haven't had this much time to tweet and golf, how do those actions help our country in the slightest?

As far as quid pro quo goes, there has to be an obvious exchamge. Trump didn't extort or lever anything during the call nor afterwards - we know for a fact that the ad.instrstion didn't know about the slashed aid until a month after the call took place.

That's what they've been proving in the impeachment hearings for the past few days. Might want to tune in instead of watching the edited highlights afterwords.

As for the point on Biden corruption, I bring it up because that was the bulk of the reason for the call - to look into the shady stuff the Biden's have done.

If Trump has knowledge or evidence of a crime being committed, calling on a foreign government to investigate his political rival is the wrong way to do things. How about he does the right thing and gives that evidence over to our justice department so that they can do their jobs and investigate him? Is it because they already investigated this and cleared him already and Donald was only doing this because he's a political rival?

As for Clinton versus Trump - Clinton lied under oath. He also screwed way too many women in office. To what I've seen, Trump hasn't, nor has he lied about it under oath.

He lied under oath, AFTER THE IMPEACHMENT HEARING WAS STARTED AND HE HAD TO TESTIFY. The fact that he looked like he was lying and Monica had come forward to be a witness was all they needed to proceed with that trial. You can't lie under oath unless you are being questioned in a court because you're already on trial or giving a statement to the court, you don't end up on trial unless you've done something worthy of it. I'm asking how was what Bill did did (suspected of lying about infidelity) differ from what Trump has done (suspected of constantly lying about tons of things)?

/r/AskReddit Thread Parent